 |
 |
|
 |
Faneuil Hall Boston
Kentie unplugged in Boston. On
the eve of Podcamp Boston, Kentie, Ninja and Special K have dinner and talk about almost everything.
Famous Restaurants Mentioned: Cheers. Famous Bookstores Mentioned: Powells. Politicians mentioned: Howard Dean, Mitt
Romney, Hilary, Barak, Al Gore, John Kerry, George Bush. Issues mentioned: Gun Control, Gay Marriage,
Universal Health Care, The disadvantages of home schooling, Freedom. Recreational Activities Mentioned: Opera. Hysterical Non-fiction: American
Facists by Chris Hedges.
Songs Played : Family Guy * The Spirit of Massachussetts
(Courtesy Episode
126 Mondo Diablo)
Podcasts listened to by Kentie:
·
2 Guys, 1 Brain
·
Bear Crawling
·
Big
Gay Sex Show
·
Bored
Beyond Belief
·
Brini
Maxwell
·
Broadway
Bullet
·
Cuppa
Tea with AJ
·
Fagbeast
of Scandiland
·
For
Whatever Reason podcast
·
Hello
Waffles
·
Hot
Fossils and Rebel Matters
·
Leather Bound
·
Mandrake
Society Radio
·
Manhandled
in Montana
·
Mikey Pod
·
New
Music Box
·
NY Times
Book Review Podcast
·
Peterson
Toscano
·
Sha-Pink
·
Sister
Paula podcast
·
Spanking
Bea Arthur
·
Strength
Nation with Jason White
·
Tastes
Like Burning
·
Tigger Cast
·
Tranny Wreck
Radio
·
Unnatural Acts of
Opera
·
Vera
Speaks
·
Wanda Wisdom
·
Yeast Radio
· Zillacast with Zillafag
· Eat This Hot Show
I guess we can retire Champaign Socialist in favor of Cocaine Socialist.
If I had a million dollars,
I'd buy me some blow.
If I had a million dollars,
And some fangirls to ... (etc)
I am never ever going to vote for John Tory, nor as far as I can tell are any of my conservative neighbors, friends or
family. While John Tory is leader we are not going to donate money to your party. If John Tory leads the party during the next
election, we are not going to allow you to put Progressive Conservative signs on our front lawns.
And the next time that fool opens his mouth about the LCBO, perhaps it should be discuss privatization rather than
plastic bags.
American's knowledge of religion shallow?
Stephen Prothero, author of the recently published Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know -- And Doesn't,
agrees that the Good Samaritan story is germane to the immigration debate because it is all about how Jesus said we should
treat strangers.
"First of all, how many Americans actually know the Good Samaritan story? I'm not sure many do," said Prof. Prothero,
chairman of Boston University's religion department. "Second, should we be basing policy on biblical passages? If we're going
to, how can we have any reasonable conversation if we don't know the story?"
Amazing -- I did twelve years of Catholic school and entirely missed the section where Jesus picked up a
half-dozen Samaritans to build him a new back porch so he could avoid paying the local Jewish boys the minimum wage he
otherwise strongly supports. What Gospel was that in again?
My brother made a lengthy
reply (that's the only kind he does, I'm afraid) to my post on Catholic education rights in Ontario.
Youcan go read it in it's entirety, I shan't quibble on legal points, that's for sure. However, he misreads my
intentionre: protection of Catholic rights.
I'm not overly fearful for Catholic rights in Ontario, Canada, or elsewhere nearby. What I do like is all the weird stuff
inour system: funny wigs, QCs, "God" in the constitution, a free pig and
two comely lasses of virtue true for the police chiefs, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, etc.. It's good to
givethe Svends, Jacks and Justins frequent reminders -- preferably up the side of the head -- that none-of Mike Pearson,
FidelCastro or Tommy Douglas were Fathers of Confederation.
I prefer cities laid out like St.John's to
that of Toronto also.
join the Heinous Teddy
Bear of Blasphemy, the Dreaded Toilet Seats of Blasphemy and the Ice Cream Lid Jihad.
UPDATE: buy the jerseys here. Via MCJ, who writes:
"Interesting concept. Your team's shirts 'offend' me therefore my team should win. Even if we're playing in your yard.
Jackasses."
Tell me about it, Christopher. We've got a bunch like that over here,
too.
I just read on Gateway Pundit that the media had fallen for another "insurgents slaughter many"-type story, likely fed to
them by an AQI propagandist / stringer. I was currious
about what CBC had said about this story but when I click on the
link .... Curious. Probably just a server error.
Robert on Latimer:
My own view is that the Court arrived at the right decision when it held that Mr. Latimer's conviction and sentence had to
be upheld. In Canada we have not even come to a societal consensus on the issue of assisting a person of full mind commit
suicide (see the Sue Rodriguez case). The
issues around a parental killing of child who is disabled and unable to communicate her wishes on an informed basis are
hopelessly more thorny. The fact of the matter is that it is impossible to genuinely appreciate the true significance of the
genuinely held belief "I must kill her because I can not bear to watch her suffer any more" -- who is truly being shown mercy
when that sentiment is acted upon? Is it mercy for the suffering child or is it mercy for the suffering caregiver? Moreover,
there is a strong sense of ownership over a child that is being asserted in such cases -- "This is my child so I can decide
whether she lives or dies."
This, however, does not make the Parole Board's decision right. Our society has sent a clear message about Mr. Latimer: he
murdered his daughter contrary to the law and was given the full sentence mandated by the law. Now he is going through the
process that every criminal in Canada is entitled to go through to ease their re-introduction to society.
Wow, I'll let others worry more about the "one
laptop per terrorist supporter" issues and say, WTF? They city's spending almost $11,000,000 / year to give computers and
high-speed Internet to 3000 families? That's about $3500 / family! Who are they buying these things from, Dash Domi? Why not just give half to the schools and half
to the local libraries to put computers for everyone?
Now, this sounds more like a "social justice" program -- i.e. Bucks for Buzz and his Boys -- than it does a meaningful
attempt to help anyone, but I've got a better deal for the city and the disadvantaged: outsource it to me and I'll save the
city lots of money and double the number of disadvantaged kids getting computers.
The logistics are fairly simple. Dell will ship directly to their apartment and I'll handle the Rogers billing from here.
I'll assume I can get Rogers and Dell to eat GST & PST given the size of the order we're making, plus the potential for a
tax write off for everyone. Rogers and Dell will also handle tech support directly, which is a reasonable part of becoming
computer literate. The city will provide the names and addresses who to ship to. I'll need 5 people at say $50,000 / each to
handle paperwork and logistics. One person will be dedicated to Googling names to weed out friends-of-terrorists. Let's also
posit that I'll maintain another 6000 Internet accounts for people who have already got their computers.
So here's the budget:
-
Internet connection: $1.65 million (6000 @ 22.95/month * 12 months)
-
Legacy internet: $1.65 million (6000 @ 22.95/month * 12 months)
-
Computers: $2.7 million (6000 @ $450 / each)
-
Employees: $250,000 (5 @ $50,000)
-
Offices: $150,000
-
Subtotal: $6.4 million
-
Management fee: 1.28 million (20%)
-
Grand total: $7.68 million
-
Savings to City of Toronto: $3.08 million
That'll buy Dave Miller a lot of food
carts. I'm available on my cell during normal working hours.
I had the unfortunate experience of having the Toronto Star in my house this morning. Ahem:
First, the Conservatives cancelled the child-care agreements the Liberals had signed with the provinces. Next, they gutted
the Kelowna Accord, the $5.1 billion federal-provincial agreement to tackle aboriginal poverty. Now they're scrapping another
piece of Liberal handiwork.
Effective March 31, 2008, the Canadian Health Network will cease to exist.
Wow. Two programs that never actually existed in any meaningful sense, and one program that no one has ever heard of. Who do
they think they are, the government?
Michelle Mann:
The public funding for Catholic schools issue has been simmering away on Ontario's backburner for a while, with
Newfoundland and Quebec already having faced it down in the 1990s (and Manitoba too, but in 1890).
Note that I can't speak to what Quebec did, but Newfoundland didn't have a Catholic school issue, it had a no-non-religious
school issue.
And yet, the only party that has it right is the Greens, whose leader, Frank de Jong, supports moving to one
publicly-funded school system.
[Liberal Leader Dalton McGuinty] defends this position with the Constitution Act, 1867,
which in section 93 enshrines Catholic school rights in place before Confederation, a concession made to get the deal.
Nonetheless, the province's exclusive jurisdiction over education means that act can be amended bilaterally through
agreement with the federal government as provided for in section 43 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and already executed by
Quebec.
"We got what we wanted from the Micks, now it's time screw 'em"
The equality rights argument has some teeth, despite a Supreme Court of Canada ruling in 1996 that Ontario's refusal to
fund other denominational schools was not a breach of freedom of religion or equality rights under the Charter of Rights and
Freedoms.
I.e. it equality rights argument has no teeth, as far as the law of the land goes.
The United Nations Human Rights Committee felt differently in both 1999 and again in 2005, censuring Canada for violating
equality rights by virtue of religious discrimination in the Ontario school system.
Oh, well there you go -- a functionary appointed by the Chinese dictatorship was told not to agree with Ontarians having a
parallel Catholic education system, I guess we'll have to ditch it.
Of course, equality is more than just a legal concept; one might be forgiven for having trouble understanding how in our
current society public funding of only Catholic schools is fair and just.
I'll freely grant it's not particularly fair. Neither is a four-way stop, but I don't seethe with the injustice that some
guy driving the opposite direction can cruise through the intersection in a few seconds because no one else was driving his
direction. More seriously and to the point, no particular harm is being done to non-Catholics, a point which I shall
return to in a moment.
Take for example, Catholic school boards across the province debating whether to ban Ontario's new HPV vaccination program
on the basis it promotes promiscuity. All Grade 8 girls in the province will have free access to a vaccine that can prevent
the HPV types responsible for 70 per cent of cervical cancer cases.
It is one thing to require parental consent, but to refuse girls access to this provincially mandated health program based
on religious values in a publicly funded school obviously contravenes a decision made by our secular government. It is also
possibly contrary to the equality rights of these young women.
She means "girls", of course. But this gets to the core of the issue: Catholics agreed to an Ontario under the condition
that Catholics could educate and raise Catholic children in a manner consistent with Catholicism. The need for the deal then
and now is obvious: Catholicism [1] is uniquely despised amongst religions by politically powerful (non-Catholic)
organizations. Mann reinforces the point: she believes it a compelling reason for Ontario to strip Catholics of their education
rights is that she is disgusted by Catholic values.
That money, along with the elimination of the duplication of resources for Catholic schools, could be directed to funding
for autistic students, accessible post-secondary education and revitalizing a flailing public education system.
So could redirecting the money being wasted [2] on HPV vaccinations or CBC writers. This argument might make sense if there
were half-filled schools and only one non-Catholic school board; as it stands, it's nonsense.
Of course, such a question is less about resources than about how we view accommodation and the secular state in our
multicultural and religiously diverse society; all the more reason for a referendum enabling a government to act with less
political fallout.
Michelle Mann is a Toronto-based consultant and freelance writer, specializing in social justice, human rights and
Aboriginal issues.
Can you imagine the veins exploding in Mann's eyeballs if it was suggested we strip aboriginal title via "political will" or
a referendum.
[1] note that I said Catholicism, not Catholics.
[2] there, I said it. I am speaking from purely a cost-benefit and risk management point of view -- it doesn't make sense to
doing this yet.
(Snowy Owl Habitat, repurposed for amusement purposes only, courtesy of Trinity-Anne)
This is amusing (from Reason Magazine):
Overall, the typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrigerator, a stove, a
clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD
player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own
report, his family is not hungry and he had sufficient funds in the past year to meet his family's essential needs. While
this individual's life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press,
liberal activists, and politicians.
Of course, the living conditions of the average poor American should not be taken as
representing all the poor. There is actually a wide range in living conditions among the poor. For example, a third of poor
households have both cellular and landline telephones. A third also have telephone answering machines. At the other extreme,
however, approximately one-tenth have no phone at all [i.e. about 1% of the population - dpj]. Similarly, while the
majority of poor households do not experience significant material problems, roughly 30 percent [i.e. about 4% - dpj]
do experience at least one problem such as overcrowding, temporary hunger, or difficulty getting medical care.
And from the original source:
The average poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens, and
other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those
classified as poor.)
... most poor children today are, in fact, supernourished and grow up
to be, on average, one inch taller and 10 pounds heavier than the GIs who stormed the beaches of Normandy in World War
II.
This would be a phenomenal time for the US to withdraw it's 37,000 troops from Korea, save a few bucks and
incidentally let South Korea grow the fuck up a little. Yahoo News:
Taliban militants agreed Tuesday to release 19 South Korean church volunteers held hostage for
six weeks after Seoul reaffirmed
a pledge to withdraw its troops by year's end and prevent Christian missionaries from working in Afghanistan.
Jean Chretien is ordering out his RCMP hit squad as I write. Guite is getting ready to rat:
In his response to the $30-million suit, Guite alleges that even when he questioned or recommended that certain
contracts not be awarded, he was told "it is the prime minister's budget and we decide on the events, how much to allocate in
funds and what agency will manage the event.
"In many cases," the statement says, "sponsorships were refused at the bureaucratic level but reversed at the
political level."
Guite lays the blame for the scandal directly on his higher-ups -- former minister of public works Alfonso Gagliano
and former prime minister Jean Chretien. He says the suit against him should be dropped and those in power at the time should
be sued instead.
Of course Mr Guite could join Chretien and Gagliano to the suit if he feels so strongly and he must certainly regret his
decision not to cut a deal and roll on his political masters back in the time of Gomery.
A few months ago I posted about problems with the
Newfoundland Jury List. Apparently the problems have been remedied:
Embarrassing problems with Newfoundland and Labrador's jury list — which caused a mistrial in May in the
high-profile case of a physician accused of drug trafficking — have been resolved, the justice minister says.
Tom Osborne says the old list, which had not been updated in about eight years, has been replaced by a new system that
will have real-time updates.
"We've done a dry run of the list, where we've pulled together a pool of potential jurors and selected a jury from
that potential pool," Osborne said Wednesday.
"We've then analyzed the whole process and determined that it's working efficiently, it's working effectively, and
that there are no glitches or bugs within the system."
The old list was based on data last updated in 1999, and collected by the motor vehicle registration system.
The new list is based on the provincial government's database for MCP, the medicare agency, and is cross-referenced
with motor vehicle registration records and the provincial voters' list.
(Tom Osborne as Minister of Justice? I don't know if you
have to be a lawyer, but a University degree would be nice. Depite what people think, it is complicated stuff and I doubt
that Osborne can't grasp the complexities when advised. His decisions (not that he makes any serious ones
without the OK of Premier Danny Williams, who was quite an accomplished lawyer) can only be political.)
What are the progressives progressing towards?
Does anyone have an answer? A guess?
I think Black got a bad deal from a court system that is in serious need of revisiting its roots (my arguments are here). I don't think it's the greatest
miscarriage of justice in the history of the universe, or anything like that, but I'm a little bit sad for him and most
suspicions I've had about the reporting profession have been
confirmed.
Anyhoo, Steve at ESR, Zolf and others saying the
Canada should give Black back his citizenship. Sorry and respectfully dudes, I disagree. I've long been a proponent that
citizenship should "mean something", and that being true, dropping that citizenship likewise should mean something. No matter
how vindictively that sorry little prick Chretien acted, Black made his own bed.
|
|
|
|
 |